 
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
turn on suggestions
 Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type. It's a sweet game but I can't get out of the boat in the begining, I've tried every dam button known to man to try to get out with out blowing it up. Any suggestions? Oh, my computer can run it but it would be nice to have some more machine. Pentium 4 2.53 MX420 256mb PC1066 ram 5400 RPM HD later
Nate
 
Its aight I guess. Sure, its pretty looking, good shadows/water. The explosions didn't impress me much. Its going to matter how fun it is to play. Because we all know HL2 is going to be fun. If this game is just shoot people and 'find the C4 pack' then i'll pass. Best part: Enemy sees you and says, "Hey! You with the shirt!" 
After beating the demo, I don’t think this game will hold up against HL2 or D3 in single player. The graphics are great (albeit nothing too fantastic when running on medium, but that’s my rig’s fault) and the A.I. seemed competent, but overall it still felt like your standard FPS. Multiplayer may be a whole different ballgame, however.
I’m running it on a 1800XP with 1GB pc2100 ddr and a GF3 Ti500. I think I need an upgrade
 Pick up the rocket launcher, hide in the long tunnel that's in the wall, pick off the gunners with your M4, and when the one helicopter comes down to drop off the three dudes, hit it with the rocket so they die inside. 
It ain't totally impressisve, it reminds me of Soldier of Fortune 2 and Unreal 2 combined. But of course, this one is abit better so far. But NOT spectecular.
------AMD X2 3800, 6800 GS AGP, 2048 DDR333
OLD SPEC AMD XP2100, 6800 GS AGP(from Radeon 9700), 1024 PC2100(from 512) 2x 3D increase for 300 dollars------ 
That is if they do anytime soon. But I guess good things come to those that wait. I hope you enjoy your new game in Q4 or 2005.
Actually, I agree. But it reminds of the goods things about those games. SOF2 was a great game up till the gun battle with the helicopter. Oh, and that Mullins looks like a stunt double for Norris is not good. Somebody should have told the developers that moustaches really should be left the Village People. But folks you really have to play this game with the settings cranked all the way up to really get the effect. Message Edited by luthorcrow on 01-26-2004 08:48 PM  hspace=0 vspace=0 align=bottom align=left>
I'd say clearly the best graphics to date for me, great environment, decent AI (what else to expect), gret detail overall a fun experience, to me it is between Serious Sam (large open environments) and Half Life (dynamics of it)... and you can try to live in that eworld - ie with the boat you can go wherever you want, try to land... just leave soldiers, come back shoot them if you like, it's probably the easiest to avoid all the soldiers and just shoot a couple at the end to accomplish te task, but surely it's not the most fun if you go about it this way. Yes it reminded me of Commandos with Arnie... in a positive way...
I considered that, so I lowered resolution and set details to the lowest, and it still didn't fix it. The gun feels like it did in Deus Ex: Invisible War before the patch.
The graphics look good until one looks to the sky. The clouds just hang there and take the effect away. It's no longer realistic. I have noticed this in several games of late. A realistic sky adds much to the game's realism.
Look to the sky in Quake III and you will see what I mean. It's not earthly but then it's not supposed to be is it! However, It Moves! Message Edited by Sivad on 01-30-2004 09:55 AM "Bad:
1) Graphics are a little too cartoonish for my taste. 2) Physics are fun but we’ve seen it all before. 3) Stupid AI that runs around in circles and bumps into things. 4) Enemies hit you from incredible distances. 5) Weak and inaccurate weapons. 6) Vehicle physics suck. Bottom line, I haven't seen anything ground breaking in this game. For the most part, been there, done that in other shooters."
This is some of the biggest BULLSH!t i have ever read.
1-understandable that u have different tastes
2-This is a lame ass comment, it's almost like saying now that we've seen good physics(like mp2) that we should now stop making games with good physics because it's been done before. O btw this games physics relating to bodies r far more advanced than anything i've seen be4.
3-I've played the demo for hours and this is rare, however that's what patches r 4(no im not saying it's an excuse to make games buggy)
4-this is purely BS, i found the AI to be 1 of the best relating to accuracy over distance, it's good yet not overboard, like a human could do it.
5- Ur obviously a novice in the skill of fps, the enemies have heavy armour over their chest/torso area, notice the sparks. Inaccurate? Compared to what?? quake? yes, cs? NO
The pistol feels cool because it fires in it's xhair yet kicks heavily to different places(not so much conefire). This is almost the exact opposite of cs, where kick in pistols feels like nothing, yet the bullets start going out of the xhair(heavy conefire).fff
6- I actually thought this was probably the best vehicle control in a game i've felt, i'll consider that ur personal taste, classify u as a moron and move on
 The main problems i found with this game was the bugs, and a lot of them there were, and the main characters voice actor!!! All my problems with the bugs were relating to the graphics, highest shadow detail causes huge problems on my 4200, numerous other bugs. What was refreshing in this game(besides the obvious things like an environment u might actually WANT to be in and free-to-roam gameplay etc...) is the actual gunfights themselves, the weapon firing feels highly effective(helped so by strong gun sfx) and killing ppl just feels satisfying
like most of you i have played many FPS's. but this demo fely different to me. it was a COD demo kind of different. something that made you fell that you have'nt done this before, when actually you have dozens of times. this is obviously a good thing. and as this is a demo there are things to be fix'd. it's to be expected. i had fun playing this demo. lets hope that they build on it they way i expect they will. we mat have a viable contender on our hands
1.The AI IS STUPID!!! Some of them would come up to me and just stands there, I was like wtf, I should have been dead. Nothing at all ground breaking from the demo
2.The physics engine IS "been there done that" feature that most new games employ. It is not the game's selling point. 3.The gameplay is again "been there done that". The only unique thing I saw was in the way the map is made, it didn't force you to start anywhere in a mission or any forced paths.
------AMD X2 3800, 6800 GS AGP, 2048 DDR333
OLD SPEC AMD XP2100, 6800 GS AGP(from Radeon 9700), 1024 PC2100(from 512) 2x 3D increase for 300 dollars------
|
|
|||||
& 
|
||||||
 |
 |